Me, Myself, & Irene
review by Gregory Avery, 23 June 2000
Films can be
bad for many reasons, but they generally tend to fall into three
categories: films which are bad because their makers followed some
particularly loony vision which causes them to fly right off the
rails, with attendant results (recent example: Battlefield Earth);
movies which are bad because they end up boring the crap out of you
(fill in your own title-of-choice, here); or, films which are bad
yet leave you in a particularly nettlesome, even resentful, mood for
hours, days, even weeks afterwards. Me, Myself and Irene,
unfortunately, falls in this latter category.
I say
"unfortunately" because, back when they made Dumb and
Dumber, in 1994, Peter and Bobby Farrelly reveled in vulgar
humor but ended up making a comedy that was essentially good-natured
and harmless: no jokes were made at anyone's expense, and the
filmmakers knew when not to press their luck.
Now, with the success of There's Something About Mary,
they have fashioned themselves as shock-provocateurs, and feel
compelled to top anything seen in their previous movie. And they
succeed: urine flies, excrement drops, body parts are brazenly
displayed, and orifices are violated with objects both inanimate and
animate (Note To Parents: Leave the kiddies home).
But we are also
asked to laugh at a dog taking a copious dump on-camera, a cow being
shot several times at point-blank range, and a little girl being
drowned in a fountain. By the time one of the main characters loses
a thumb, and you get the queasy feeling that we are supposed to
react to this with uproarious laughter, the film has become a very
unpleasant experience.
Narrated by Rex
Allen, Jr, in the same folksy manner he used in the Walt Disney True
Life Adventures (and exactly why the Farrellys chose to use this
in the film, I don't know), the story, or what there is of it (the
filmmakers' narrative skills also seem to be deteriorating),
concerns Charlie Baileygates (Jim Carrey), a Rhode Island state
trouper encharged with the duty of
transporting Irene (Renée Zellweger) to face charges in
another jurisdiction. What Irene doesn't know is that Charlie, who
was both thoroughly humiliated and demoralized over the
circumstances under which his ex-wife left him, has developed a
second personality that emerges whenever he is faced with
confrontation -- Hank, who has absolutely no problem settling scores
with either adults, children, or vending machines.
The only reason
Zellweger is cast in the film is so that we could be treated to the
sight of a pretty young actress snarling at everyone and everything
around her all the time. (Talented as she may
be, "withering putdown" and "acid wit"
are not exactly in her repertory.) She and Chris Cooper, who plays a
bad guy chasing after Irene, have the most terrible expressions on
their face throughout the movie, like the huge cooked fish that is
served to Noel Coward during a scene in the movie Boom
(Coward took one look at it and said, "What is this horror from
the deep? It has the most dreadful expression on its face").
Jim Carrey, who,
over the last six years, has turned into one of the most prolific
and inspired performers working today, has slowed down a bit from
the manic flights he took in earlier films such as Liar, Liar,
and when he gets the chance to do something funny, he does so, and
does so well (One scene indicates that he would have been a perfect
choice to play Mason Verger in the film version of Thomas Harris' Hannibal).
But as soon as he starts developing some sort of characterization as
Charlie, he has to switch to playing Hank, and starts trying to
develop some sort of characterization for him. The result is two
performances that don't seem fully realized, either separately or as
one entity: Charlie comes across as too bland, while Hank, his voice
register tucked down into a Dirty Harry Callahan-like range, becomes
monotonous as he levels his gaze and mutters one oh-that's-awful
piece of dialogue after another.
But the most
troubling thing about the film is its pervasive air of
mean-spiritedness (it's probably why Zellweger and Cooper look so
distressed). A couple of sympathetic scenes between Charlie and
Irene have been included, but they come across as monstrously
insincere, because you know that the characters are simply being set
up for some new outrage that is lurking just around the corner to
slap them down; it doesn't matter whether we feel anything towards
them or not. The end effect is much like what one feels after seeing
the most assaulting advertisements or music videos, which hit you
with everything they got in a very short period of time. Perhaps the
Farrellys have come to believe that audiences are now mistaking
sadism for humor, or that they've become so insensitive that this is
the only way they can break through and get a reaction out of
anyone, anymore. Perhaps, until the audience finally says enough,
already.
|
Directed by:
Bobby Farrelly
Peter Farrelly
Starring:
Jim Carrey
Renée Zellweger
Chris Cooper
Robert Forster
Written by:
Mike Cerrone
Bobby Farrelly
Peter Farrelly
FULL
CREDITS
BUY
VIDEO
|
|