| |
Mimic
Review by Carrie
Gorringe
Posted 22 August 1997
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d82b/2d82b0848c805280170e1531ec17edc006e8f554" alt="" |
|
Directed by Guillermo del Toro Starring Mira Sorvino, Jeremy Northam,
Alexander Goodwin, Giancarlo Giannini,
Charles S. Dutton, Josh Brolin,
Alix Koromzay, F. and Murray Abraham
Screenplay by Matthew Robbins and
Guillermo del Toro, based on the short story by
Donald A. Wolheim |
The setting: New York City, four
years earlier. A plague has targeted the citys children, and they are dying in
record numbers, antibiotics being powerless to stop its relentless encroachment. The
similarities between this plague and another, one much blacker in name, that eliminated
one-third of the worlds population some five hundred years ago is chillingly
apparent. This time, however, the answer to this plague comes not from Gods
judgement or poisoned well water, but from the emerging field of bio-engineering. Dr.
Susan Tyler (Sorvino) is one of its most promising acolytes. She combines forces with the
head of the Center for Disease Control, Dr. Peter Mann (Northam), who just happens to be
her husband, to fight the plague. Tylers plan is to recombine the DNA from various
species to create a counteragent to the disease. She calls her new creation a cross
between a mantis and a cockroach the "Judas Breed." Miraculously, the
cure takes hold and the disease is not allowed to run its deadly course. Since the breed
has a life span of six months, there would appear to be no long-lasting side effects to
this necessary invention. The warnings from her former professor (Abraham) about the
dangers of playing God seem to have been only the ravings of a scientific paranoiac.
Forward to the
present, where Dr. Tyler is about to discover just how successful her creation has been.
Mysterious and grisly deaths begin to manifest themselves around the city. Tyler and Mann
soon discover that the Judas breed has learned how to "mimic" its predator, in
conjunction with the natural laws of evolution. The creatures have not only outwitted
their built-in self-destruct sequence, but they have also adopted human characteristics,
threatening the city. One little boy, Chuy (Goodwin), is the first to take note of this
sinister development, though his observations are not of the scientific sort; all he
notices are the "neat shoes" on one of the victims. Oblivious to the danger the
creatures represent, Chuy is soon communicating with them so often that his father
(Giannini), a shoe-shine man who works out of the Delancy St. subway station, thinks his
son is suffering from delusions. But soon Drs. Tyler and Mann also converge on the same
station, having traced the source of the creatures to the tunnels below. In the process,
they enlist the assistance of a skeptical subway officer (Dutton) and a detective (Brolin)
who has been investigating these deaths. The search takes Tyler and Mann, and their four
unwitting and unwilling accomplices, into the depths of the system. They will discover
history and terror and their own limits.
The narrative of Mimic pulses with fear not a surprising phenomenon, once
you learn that, in addition to Robbins and del Toro, director and noted script-doctor John
Sayles, no slouch in constructing compelling stories himself, had a hand in Mimics
creation. Remove all of the assistance, however, and this is still director del
Toros nearly-exclusive domain. His 1993 debut, the intriguing-but-flawed Cronos,
contained several
motifs that would influence the development of Mimic; they are both basic genre
films with themes that coalesce around the danger of scientists as sacerdotal figures, who
act without acknowledging the potential consequences of their actions. Cronos is
the tale of an alchemist who creates a device would anyone be surprised to learn
that it is called the "Cronos" device? that keeps him alive for nearly
four hundred years; at the heart of the machine is an insect whose fluids provide life at
the cost of developing a taste for human blood, and the fight over who will possess the
device following the inventors demise is, predictably, bloody and tragic. It is also
very slowly paced, and, at times, seems more interested in the psychological motivations
of transformation than in narrative progress. Four years later, del Toros talent for
genre has finally broken through, since he has succeeded in combining all of the necessary
elements. Gone are the straightforward approaches to framing and lighting that also
undermined Cronos; instead, del Toro accelerates the films nail-biting
quotient by a liberal use of off-center framing, achingly slow pans and the sudden
inclusion of editing that moves at something approaching light speed. Its almost as
if del Toro has staked a claim to the structure, one that is more than legitimate.
The only legitimate complaint one can raise about the film comes from the deeply flawed
premise that sits at its heart. Unfortunately, the rules of biological evolution do not
favor the belief that prey often takes on the characteristics of its predators; it is the
reverse that occurs. Predators want to get as close to their prey as possible; it would,
therefore, behoove them to blend in with the surroundings of their future food supply. For
all of that, the film is still enough of a crackling suspense piece to allow me to forgive
it this glaring lapse in logic. Although the concept of "sacerdotal science", and the dire warnings
against it, are hardly new, courtesy of Shelley and her Dr. Frankenstein, not to mention
the more vile machinations by Hitlers own eugenicists (the phrase "sacerdotal
science" was in fact coined by German scientist Benno Muller-Hill to describe the
motivations behind the pseudo-scientific depredations of Mengele et al.), there is an
important reminder in Mimic about the sometimes disastrous consequences that ensue
when good intentions, time pressures and closed systems are interwoven; quantum mechanics
may have superceded many of Newtons laws, but perhaps his third law
concerning actions that result in equal and opposite reactions isnt quite as
anachronistic as previously thought, at least in regard to biology.
The director is also blessed with actors who are taking their work seriously, and the
overall effect shows. This is most evident in the case of Sorvino, whose past roles in Mighty Aphrodite and the dreadful Romy
and Michelles
might lead to the impression that the actress is in
desperate need of some wind to blow in her ears so that some substance can fill the vacuum
resting within. She is affecting and effective as the well-meaning Dr. Tyler. All of the
other performances are equally strong. Mimic may not be the shriekfest promised by
the advertising, but it will keep you on the edge of your seat and keep you thinking.
Contents | Features
| Reviews | News | Archives | Store
Copyright © 1999 by Nitrate Productions, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
| |
|