The
Statement is the kind of inert, serious-minded Holocaust-themed
film that makes you pine for campy Nazi-hunting adventures like the
Laurence Olivier-Gregory Peck Hitler cloning saga The
Boys from Brazil. This earnest historical suspense yarn from
director Norman Jewison (Fiddler
on the Roof, The Hurricane)
concerns a former Vichy government murderer sought by both a dogged
French judge and the ex-Vichy bigwigs who want their secret
Nazi-sympathizing pasts concealed. The
Statement (based on the novel by Brian Moore) wants to be both a
thriller and a revelatory historical exposé, but on both counts it
falls flat. Stern and stolid, Jewison’s film can’t muster an
ounce of edge-of-your-seat tension, and, even worse, its
condemnation of the Vichy government amounts to little more than an
inadequate slap on the wrist.
Pierre Brossard (Michael Caine) killed seven Jews in 1944 as a willing member of the Vichy government’s military police. Although pardoned for his crimes years later, Brossard is forced back into hiding by a pesky new Crimes Against Humanity law that has made him both fresh bait for prosecutors interested in nabbing France’s remaining Vichy-era criminals, and a dangerous nuisance to those in government who would prefer Brossard not spill his guts about the current administration’s ties to the Vichy regime. As portrayed by Caine, Brossard is a devout religious man hiding, like a simpering coward, in abbeys across the country for fear that his capture will surely mean spending his final days locked behind bars. Yet when confronted with life-and-death decisions, the trembling, agitated Brossard undergoes a startling transformation – his eyes turn cold, his lips contort into a snarl, and his movements become swift and deadly. He’s like a wounded dog who, when backed into a corner, bares some mighty impressive fangs.
Judge Annemarie Livi (Tilda Swinton) and her military sidekick Colonel Roux (Jeremy Northam) are hot on Brossard’s trail, suspecting the fugitive is being sheltered by both the Catholic Church and the government. Unfortunately, their tenacious, Veronica Guerin-like investigation – characterized by demanding immediate answers with rude bluntness – soon becomes a wearisome expository device constructed to give us some filler about Brossard’s powerful friends. As they race to find Brossard, Swinton and Northam exchange limp banter with erudite snappiness in English and without a French accent (thus giving the film a peculiarly British feel), and they eventually deduce the conspiracy that’s keeping Brossard temporarily safe with unbelievable ease. Charlotte Rampling fares better as Brossard’s scorned wife, instilling the film with some passion and vitriol during a scene in which she is reunited with her husband-on-the-run. Yet as befitting a film with jumbled priorities, Rampling disappears almost as soon as she appears, thus turning a potentially fascinating detour into just another distracting narrative affectation.